It is generally accepted that the cyclical phenomenon underlying the “Quésako Cycle” is not a perfect sine wave. It is a sine wave that fluctuates and whose period can vary. The average period is 3,095 days, but the actual period could range from 2,200 days to 3,800 days.

If we knew the origin of this cyclical phenomenon, we wouldn’t need to readjust the peaks; observing the cyclical phenomenon that causes this cycle would be enough to determine the variations.

This is an important issue that has not been convincingly resolved.

So far, there has been only one adjustment of -679 days applied in early 2025 to the wars of 2014. This adjustment stems from the observation that several major wars broke out within a short period of time in 2014. It was hypothesized that this meant the peak of amplification had shifted to that time.

Just because one peak is shifted doesn’t mean that the subsequent peaks are shifted in the same way.

While the concept of resetting (to be tested in early 2025) is appealing, it would be preferable not to reset the Quesako cycle by 100% with every change, but rather by a smaller percentage (50 to 75%).

Researchers who take over the “Cycle Quésako” study should be aware that the recalibration method needs to be reviewed.

The best approach would be to identify the cause of this cyclical phenomenon, but there are no credible leads yet. The current suspension of research into the “Quesako Cycle” (due to a lack of adequate resources) is preventing any progress on the matter.

JBR

April 15, 2026